<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1503 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the impugned orders concerning service tax demands on works contracts. They held that service tax on indivisible Works Contract Service (WCS) prior to 01/06/2007 was not valid, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding the penalties imposed unjustified and invoking the extended period under Section 73 incorrect. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1503 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the impugned orders concerning service tax demands on works contracts. They held that service tax on indivisible Works Contract Service (WCS) prior to 01/06/2007 was not valid, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding the penalties imposed unjustified and invoking the extended period under Section 73 incorrect. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>