<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1487 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353218</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s Cenvat Credit denial of around Rs. 70,000 was set aside by the Tribunal. The denial based on invoices being photocopies and in the name of the Head Office was deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal found that the denial solely on the basis of the Head Office&#039;s name on the invoices was unjustified. The matter was remanded for document examination upon production of original invoices, ensuring a fair opportunity for substantiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1487 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353218</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s Cenvat Credit denial of around Rs. 70,000 was set aside by the Tribunal. The denial based on invoices being photocopies and in the name of the Head Office was deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal found that the denial solely on the basis of the Head Office&#039;s name on the invoices was unjustified. The matter was remanded for document examination upon production of original invoices, ensuring a fair opportunity for substantiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>