<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 51 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11150</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty order under section 271B due to the invalid show cause notice lacking the Assessing Officer&#039;s signature. Emphasizing the importance of a valid notice as a jurisdictional requirement, the Court found the deficiencies not curable under section 292B. Procedural compliance in penalty proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 was highlighted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 51 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11150</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty order under section 271B due to the invalid show cause notice lacking the Assessing Officer&#039;s signature. Emphasizing the importance of a valid notice as a jurisdictional requirement, the Court found the deficiencies not curable under section 292B. Procedural compliance in penalty proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 was highlighted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>