<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 716 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197187</link>
    <description>A bag carried on a person&#039;s head is not part of the human body for Section 50 of the NDPS Act, so its search does not amount to a personal search and does not attract the statutory safeguards for such searches. Mere police questioning on suspicion, without material showing compulsion, does not establish compelled confession or self-incrimination protection. On these principles, the reported result was restoration of the conviction and sentence and setting aside of the acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 17:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 716 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197187</link>
      <description>A bag carried on a person&#039;s head is not part of the human body for Section 50 of the NDPS Act, so its search does not amount to a personal search and does not attract the statutory safeguards for such searches. Mere police questioning on suspicion, without material showing compulsion, does not establish compelled confession or self-incrimination protection. On these principles, the reported result was restoration of the conviction and sentence and setting aside of the acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>