<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1715 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197171</link>
    <description>Prayer in the interlocutory application was not opposed, so the Court granted it and dismissed the SLP qua respondent No. 1. The order records only that limited procedural disposition and does not state any substantive ruling on the underlying central excise issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1715 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197171</link>
      <description>Prayer in the interlocutory application was not opposed, so the Court granted it and dismissed the SLP qua respondent No. 1. The order records only that limited procedural disposition and does not state any substantive ruling on the underlying central excise issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>