<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds Rejection of VCES Application, Citing Activation of First Proviso to Section 106(1) of Finance Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37318</link>
    <description>Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) - rejection of the application - Appellant submitted that, merely because the appellant had been issued with a notice for the earlier period, would not mean that the First Proviso to subsection (1) of Section 106 of the Finance Act, would come into operation - tribunal rejected the contention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds Rejection of VCES Application, Citing Activation of First Proviso to Section 106(1) of Finance Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37318</link>
      <description>Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) - rejection of the application - Appellant submitted that, merely because the appellant had been issued with a notice for the earlier period, would not mean that the First Proviso to subsection (1) of Section 106 of the Finance Act, would come into operation - tribunal rejected the contention.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>