<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. It was determined that the disallowed interest expenditure did not amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified based on the lack of evidence showing concealment or inaccuracies, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. It was determined that the disallowed interest expenditure did not amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified based on the lack of evidence showing concealment or inaccuracies, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>