<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353199</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed by the assessing officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 271(1)(C) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of specificity and ambiguity in the penalty order, aligning with the principles outlined by the High Court regarding penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353199</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed by the assessing officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 271(1)(C) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of specificity and ambiguity in the penalty order, aligning with the principles outlined by the High Court regarding penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>