https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353192 The court declined to entertain the Writ Petition challenging the order prohibiting the petitioner from working in Customs Zones and surrendering Custom Passes, citing the availability of alternative remedies like approaching the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was directed to participate in a post-decisional hearing, submit written representations, and dispute the allegations within 15 days. The court emphasized the importance of utilizing legal avenues, ensuring due process, and expediting proceedings for resolution within two months. en-us Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353192 The court declined to entertain the Writ Petition challenging the order prohibiting the petitioner from working in Customs Zones and surrendering Custom Passes, citing the availability of alternative remedies like approaching the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was directed to participate in a post-decisional hearing, submit written representations, and dispute the allegations within 15 days. The court emphasized the importance of utilizing legal avenues, ensuring due process, and expediting proceedings for resolution within two months. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353192