<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1457 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353188</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders confirming the demand for differential duty as the petitioner fulfilled the export obligation by obtaining the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate. The judge declared that the petitioner had met the export obligation requirements under the advance license, leading to the closure of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:33:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1457 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353188</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders confirming the demand for differential duty as the petitioner fulfilled the export obligation by obtaining the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate. The judge declared that the petitioner had met the export obligation requirements under the advance license, leading to the closure of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>