<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1450 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353181</link>
    <description>Contractual disputes concerning affirmative voting rights, alteration of articles, approval of accounts and auditor appointments under a shareholders&#039; agreement are arbitrable where they concern rights in personam rather than corporate rights in rem. An arbitration clause incorporated into the articles of association binds the principal parties, particularly where arbitral proceedings have already been invoked and joined. Non-signatory respondents do not necessarily prevent arbitration where the dispute arises from a composite transaction and their participation is unnecessary to the core reference. An oppression and mismanagement petition cannot bypass arbitration by attaching statutory labels to contractual claims; proceedings should yield to the agreed arbitral forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:31:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1450 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353181</link>
      <description>Contractual disputes concerning affirmative voting rights, alteration of articles, approval of accounts and auditor appointments under a shareholders&#039; agreement are arbitrable where they concern rights in personam rather than corporate rights in rem. An arbitration clause incorporated into the articles of association binds the principal parties, particularly where arbitral proceedings have already been invoked and joined. Non-signatory respondents do not necessarily prevent arbitration where the dispute arises from a composite transaction and their participation is unnecessary to the core reference. An oppression and mismanagement petition cannot bypass arbitration by attaching statutory labels to contractual claims; proceedings should yield to the agreed arbitral forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>