https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353178 Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search and not to recovery from a carton, container or premises, so seizure of heroin from a textile shop remained valid. The conviction was supported by the accused's voluntary Section 67 statements, corroborative circumstantial evidence, and the operation of the reverse presumptions under Sections 35 and 54 once conscious possession was established; non-examination of some mahazar witnesses did not by itself discredit the prosecution. The Special Court was also entitled to proceed as a Court of Session under the NDPS scheme. On sentence, the term was reduced to the statutory minimum. en-us Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:29:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353178 Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search and not to recovery from a carton, container or premises, so seizure of heroin from a textile shop remained valid. The conviction was supported by the accused's voluntary Section 67 statements, corroborative circumstantial evidence, and the operation of the reverse presumptions under Sections 35 and 54 once conscious possession was established; non-examination of some mahazar witnesses did not by itself discredit the prosecution. The Special Court was also entitled to proceed as a Court of Session under the NDPS scheme. On sentence, the term was reduced to the statutory minimum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353178