<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1428 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353159</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit eligibility cannot be disputed in refund proceedings unless a show cause notice is issued under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with the governing demand and recovery provisions. The Tribunal treated the point as covered by an earlier Division Bench decision and held that, in the absence of such notice, disallowance of credit was not sustainable. The text records that the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:22:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1428 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353159</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit eligibility cannot be disputed in refund proceedings unless a show cause notice is issued under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with the governing demand and recovery provisions. The Tribunal treated the point as covered by an earlier Division Bench decision and held that, in the absence of such notice, disallowance of credit was not sustainable. The text records that the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>