<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1309 - ITAT, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197144</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal admitting additional evidence and remitting the issues of disallowance of notional interest on advances/share application money and addition of unverifiable creditors back to the CIT(A) for further examination. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding business purposes for advances to a sister concern were supported by bank statements, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to provide a fair opportunity for reexamination by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1309 - ITAT, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197144</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal admitting additional evidence and remitting the issues of disallowance of notional interest on advances/share application money and addition of unverifiable creditors back to the CIT(A) for further examination. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding business purposes for advances to a sister concern were supported by bank statements, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to provide a fair opportunity for reexamination by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>