<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1602 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197147</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Director&#039;s order, dismissing the appellant&#039;s arguments and affirming fines for failing to report Cash Transaction Reports (CTRs) and lacking an internal mechanism. It emphasized the necessity of complying with Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) provisions and maintaining effective internal systems for detecting and reporting cash transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1602 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197147</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Director&#039;s order, dismissing the appellant&#039;s arguments and affirming fines for failing to report Cash Transaction Reports (CTRs) and lacking an internal mechanism. It emphasized the necessity of complying with Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) provisions and maintaining effective internal systems for detecting and reporting cash transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>