<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1586 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was insufficient evidence linking them to collusion in misdeclaration of country of origin and port of lading to evade Anti-dumping Duty. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, M/s. Seatrans Freight Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Shri K.V. Srinivasan, noting the lack of concrete evidence implicating them in the fraudulent activities, ultimately allowing their appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1586 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was insufficient evidence linking them to collusion in misdeclaration of country of origin and port of lading to evade Anti-dumping Duty. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, M/s. Seatrans Freight Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Shri K.V. Srinivasan, noting the lack of concrete evidence implicating them in the fraudulent activities, ultimately allowing their appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>