https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197160 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the validity of re-opening assessments for AY 2008-09 and disallowed deductions under section 36(1)(viia) for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13. The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for AY 2008-09 due to lack of new evidence and upheld the re-opening for AY 2009-10 based on errors in deduction computation. The cases were remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with a focus on providing the appellant a fair hearing. en-us Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:04:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197160 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the validity of re-opening assessments for AY 2008-09 and disallowed deductions under section 36(1)(viia) for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13. The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for AY 2008-09 due to lack of new evidence and upheld the re-opening for AY 2009-10 based on errors in deduction computation. The cases were remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with a focus on providing the appellant a fair hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197160