<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 704 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the notice under Section 143(2) issued by the Assessing Officer was time-barred, rendering the assessment void ab initio. Consequently, the block assessment was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed while the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial discipline and consistency by following the decisions of higher judicial authorities, even from non-jurisdictional High Courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:37:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 704 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the notice under Section 143(2) issued by the Assessing Officer was time-barred, rendering the assessment void ab initio. Consequently, the block assessment was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed while the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial discipline and consistency by following the decisions of higher judicial authorities, even from non-jurisdictional High Courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>