<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1533 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197138</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged foreign exchange contravention could not be sustained where it rested mainly on retracted statements of the appellant and a co-noticee, without independent corroboration. Cash recovered from a residence was not linked to the appellant&#039;s business accounts, and the typed sheets lacked signatures or other reliable proof connecting them to the appellant. The wife&#039;s statement was not relied on for the adverse finding. The tribunal also noted the criminal court&#039;s acquittal on the same allegations after appraisal of the evidence. On this material, the finding of contravention was not supported and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:35:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1533 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197138</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged foreign exchange contravention could not be sustained where it rested mainly on retracted statements of the appellant and a co-noticee, without independent corroboration. Cash recovered from a residence was not linked to the appellant&#039;s business accounts, and the typed sheets lacked signatures or other reliable proof connecting them to the appellant. The wife&#039;s statement was not relied on for the adverse finding. The tribunal also noted the criminal court&#039;s acquittal on the same allegations after appraisal of the evidence. On this material, the finding of contravention was not supported and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>