<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1412 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by condoning the delay in filing and modifying the deletion of the addition on account of bogus purchases. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) regarding the deletion of additions on account of bogus liabilities and disallowance of alleged cash purchases. The final order was pronounced on December 22, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1412 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by condoning the delay in filing and modifying the deletion of the addition on account of bogus purchases. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) regarding the deletion of additions on account of bogus liabilities and disallowance of alleged cash purchases. The final order was pronounced on December 22, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>