<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of merits back to the CIT(A) for a detailed examination and conclusive decision, emphasizing the need for a complete assessment of the grounds raised by the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of addressing both the validity of reopening assessments and the merits of additions made during assessments for a fair resolution of tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 08:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of merits back to the CIT(A) for a detailed examination and conclusive decision, emphasizing the need for a complete assessment of the grounds raised by the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of addressing both the validity of reopening assessments and the merits of additions made during assessments for a fair resolution of tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>