https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353124 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1.10 crores as undisclosed investments in M/s. SAAR Properties for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal found that the seized document containing projected figures lacked a date and could not substantiate the addition. The assessee's appeal for 2005-06 was allowed, while the Revenue's appeal for the same year and the assessee's appeal for 2006-07 were dismissed. The order was pronounced on October 17, 2017. en-us Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353124 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1.10 crores as undisclosed investments in M/s. SAAR Properties for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal found that the seized document containing projected figures lacked a date and could not substantiate the addition. The assessee's appeal for 2005-06 was allowed, while the Revenue's appeal for the same year and the assessee's appeal for 2006-07 were dismissed. The order was pronounced on October 17, 2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353124