<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order imposing a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that once duty, interest, and a portion of the penalty were paid before adjudication, no further penalty could be imposed. The Tribunal emphasized that the proceedings had to be closed after such payments, precluding additional penalties. This decision clarified penalty provisions under the Customs Act, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:52:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order imposing a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that once duty, interest, and a portion of the penalty were paid before adjudication, no further penalty could be imposed. The Tribunal emphasized that the proceedings had to be closed after such payments, precluding additional penalties. This decision clarified penalty provisions under the Customs Act, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>