<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1380 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Original Authority&#039;s decision holding the appellant liable for service tax under &quot;site formation services&quot; and &quot;mining services&quot; for the period March 2006 to June 2009. The Tribunal found that the services provided aligned more with Business Auxiliary Services rather than &quot;mining services&quot; post 1.6.2007. Relying on the contract terms and activities performed, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant&#039;s services were not appropriately classified under the disputed categories. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as the impugned order was deemed unsustainable on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1380 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Original Authority&#039;s decision holding the appellant liable for service tax under &quot;site formation services&quot; and &quot;mining services&quot; for the period March 2006 to June 2009. The Tribunal found that the services provided aligned more with Business Auxiliary Services rather than &quot;mining services&quot; post 1.6.2007. Relying on the contract terms and activities performed, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant&#039;s services were not appropriately classified under the disputed categories. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as the impugned order was deemed unsustainable on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>