<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand, interest, and penalty under Section 11AC but set aside the penalty imposed on the Director under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was pronounced on 14.11.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand, interest, and penalty under Section 11AC but set aside the penalty imposed on the Director under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was pronounced on 14.11.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>