<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1369 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353100</link>
    <description>The confiscation of readymade garments was deemed unjustified due to the absence of a specific notification including such garments under Central Excise Duty. However, Central Excise Duty was upheld on branded garments based on assessable value and tariff values, with penalties imposed. The redemption fine on seized goods, though contested, was not specifically addressed, leading to the setting aside of the confiscation order while upholding duty demands and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1369 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353100</link>
      <description>The confiscation of readymade garments was deemed unjustified due to the absence of a specific notification including such garments under Central Excise Duty. However, Central Excise Duty was upheld on branded garments based on assessable value and tariff values, with penalties imposed. The redemption fine on seized goods, though contested, was not specifically addressed, leading to the setting aside of the confiscation order while upholding duty demands and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>