<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1110 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197117</link>
    <description>A foreign enterprise&#039;s Indian subsidiaries do not constitute a permanent establishment under the India-Germany DTAA merely because they are controlled, guided, or monitored by the parent; absent an office, branch, employees, or conduct of the foreign business through the subsidiaries, no PE is established. Royalty and fees for technical services are taxable under Article 12 unless they are shown to be attributable to an Indian permanent establishment through a real economic nexus; without such attribution, domestic tax treatment as business profits does not prevail over the treaty. The Revenue&#039;s objections on PE and attribution therefore failed, while only limited connected matters were remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1110 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197117</link>
      <description>A foreign enterprise&#039;s Indian subsidiaries do not constitute a permanent establishment under the India-Germany DTAA merely because they are controlled, guided, or monitored by the parent; absent an office, branch, employees, or conduct of the foreign business through the subsidiaries, no PE is established. Royalty and fees for technical services are taxable under Article 12 unless they are shown to be attributable to an Indian permanent establishment through a real economic nexus; without such attribution, domestic tax treatment as business profits does not prevail over the treaty. The Revenue&#039;s objections on PE and attribution therefore failed, while only limited connected matters were remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>