https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197129 The Court allowed the application seeking modification of paragraph 20 of the order dated 26.09.2016 to correct the number of equity shareholders in the transferee company from 27 to 28. All shareholders had provided consents or no objections to the merger scheme. The Court dispensed with the need for a shareholders' meeting and directed a deposit to the Common Pool Fund. The judgment stressed the significance of accurate information in legal matters and facilitated rectification of errors to uphold the integrity of the merger scheme. en-us Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197129 The Court allowed the application seeking modification of paragraph 20 of the order dated 26.09.2016 to correct the number of equity shareholders in the transferee company from 27 to 28. All shareholders had provided consents or no objections to the merger scheme. The Court dispensed with the need for a shareholders' meeting and directed a deposit to the Common Pool Fund. The judgment stressed the significance of accurate information in legal matters and facilitated rectification of errors to uphold the integrity of the merger scheme. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197129