<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1469 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197114</link>
    <description>A foreign enterprise is not taxable in India on business profits unless it is shown to have a permanent establishment or business connection, and the Revenue must also establish a direct economic nexus between the receipts and that permanent establishment. Applying the assessee&#039;s earlier year position, the ITAT noted that Indian subsidiaries merely provided support and did not carry on the foreign enterprise&#039;s business activities, so no permanent establishment was created. It further held that royalty, fees for technical services and interest were not attributable to any permanent establishment, making gross-basis taxation under the domestic provisions inappropriate and preserving the treaty rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:01:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1469 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197114</link>
      <description>A foreign enterprise is not taxable in India on business profits unless it is shown to have a permanent establishment or business connection, and the Revenue must also establish a direct economic nexus between the receipts and that permanent establishment. Applying the assessee&#039;s earlier year position, the ITAT noted that Indian subsidiaries merely provided support and did not carry on the foreign enterprise&#039;s business activities, so no permanent establishment was created. It further held that royalty, fees for technical services and interest were not attributable to any permanent establishment, making gross-basis taxation under the domestic provisions inappropriate and preserving the treaty rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>