<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 920 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197111</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition due to both parties&#039; misconduct, with the petitioner found to have approached the court with unclean hands. The court held that the actions of both parties were not in the best interest of the company. All interim orders were to remain in force until 26/06/2014 for the petitioner to appeal the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 920 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197111</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition due to both parties&#039; misconduct, with the petitioner found to have approached the court with unclean hands. The court held that the actions of both parties were not in the best interest of the company. All interim orders were to remain in force until 26/06/2014 for the petitioner to appeal the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>