<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 628 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197108</link>
    <description>The SC determined that the Arbitration Act, 1940 governed the proceedings, as they commenced prior to the enactment of the 1996 Act, with the notice for the appointment of an arbitrator served on 14.09.1995. The notice was deemed valid, and the Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed as not maintainable. The court directed the arbitration award to be finalized within four months from the order&#039;s communication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 628 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197108</link>
      <description>The SC determined that the Arbitration Act, 1940 governed the proceedings, as they commenced prior to the enactment of the 1996 Act, with the notice for the appointment of an arbitrator served on 14.09.1995. The notice was deemed valid, and the Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed as not maintainable. The court directed the arbitration award to be finalized within four months from the order&#039;s communication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>