<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1357 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353088</link>
    <description>The court found that the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment was erroneous and lacked proper examination of the transactions, leading to a perverse outcome. The cases were remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration with instructions to prioritize the appeals due to their age. The impugned judgment was quashed, and the appeals were partly allowed with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1357 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353088</link>
      <description>The court found that the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment was erroneous and lacked proper examination of the transactions, leading to a perverse outcome. The cases were remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration with instructions to prioritize the appeals due to their age. The impugned judgment was quashed, and the appeals were partly allowed with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>