<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT-(A)&#039;s decision regarding the unverified advances from customers for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal found no justification for further additions, noting that where the Assessing Officer verified advances and customers confirmed payments, no additional additions were warranted. The order was sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT-(A)&#039;s decision regarding the unverified advances from customers for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal found no justification for further additions, noting that where the Assessing Officer verified advances and customers confirmed payments, no additional additions were warranted. The order was sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>