<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1332 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the deduction for the second flat under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee could only claim the deduction for one residential house, as clarified by the amendment to Section 54(1) by the Finance Act, 2014. The appeal was dismissed on December 11, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1332 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the deduction for the second flat under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee could only claim the deduction for one residential house, as clarified by the amendment to Section 54(1) by the Finance Act, 2014. The appeal was dismissed on December 11, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>