<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1325 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the assessee and Revenue, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination of the annual value of the property located at North Beach Road, Chennai. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a location-specific approach rather than a generalized application of a multiplication factor for income estimation, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1325 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the assessee and Revenue, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination of the annual value of the property located at North Beach Road, Chennai. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a location-specific approach rather than a generalized application of a multiplication factor for income estimation, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>