<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1324 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of approval under section 10(23C), emphasizing that ancillary objects related to child labor were deemed ancillary to the main educational purpose of the pharmacy college. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the exemption application, highlighting the significance of the institution&#039;s primary educational purpose in determining eligibility for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1324 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of approval under section 10(23C), emphasizing that ancillary objects related to child labor were deemed ancillary to the main educational purpose of the pharmacy college. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the exemption application, highlighting the significance of the institution&#039;s primary educational purpose in determining eligibility for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>