<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1318 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353049</link>
    <description>The Appellant, an Operational Creditor, sought the initiation of a Corporate Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application due to the Operational Creditor initiating arbitration proceedings before issuing a Demand Notice. The Tribunal determined that arbitration proceedings commence upon receiving a request for dispute resolution, referencing legal precedents. The relevance of Section 5(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, defining &quot;dispute,&quot; was emphasized in assessing ongoing arbitration&#039;s applicability. Despite debates on arbitration clauses, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal but allowed further action if arbitration clauses were absent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1318 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353049</link>
      <description>The Appellant, an Operational Creditor, sought the initiation of a Corporate Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application due to the Operational Creditor initiating arbitration proceedings before issuing a Demand Notice. The Tribunal determined that arbitration proceedings commence upon receiving a request for dispute resolution, referencing legal precedents. The relevance of Section 5(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, defining &quot;dispute,&quot; was emphasized in assessing ongoing arbitration&#039;s applicability. Despite debates on arbitration clauses, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal but allowed further action if arbitration clauses were absent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>