<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1312 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim based on limitation grounds. It held that the initial transfer request constituted the refund application, filed within the statutory time frame, and emphasized the appellant&#039;s diligence in pursuing the matter. The decision underscored the appellant&#039;s right to claim refund should not be hindered by the tax authorities&#039; lack of response and guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1312 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim based on limitation grounds. It held that the initial transfer request constituted the refund application, filed within the statutory time frame, and emphasized the appellant&#039;s diligence in pursuing the matter. The decision underscored the appellant&#039;s right to claim refund should not be hindered by the tax authorities&#039; lack of response and guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>