https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353041 The Tribunal set aside the confirmed service tax demand against the appellant, ruling that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as the appellant had complied with statutory provisions. The appellant's trading activities were considered exempted services until a specific date, and as a registered assessee who timely filed returns, the Tribunal found no basis for the demand. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and the impugned order was overturned. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:34:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353041 The Tribunal set aside the confirmed service tax demand against the appellant, ruling that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as the appellant had complied with statutory provisions. The appellant's trading activities were considered exempted services until a specific date, and as a registered assessee who timely filed returns, the Tribunal found no basis for the demand. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and the impugned order was overturned. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353041