https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353039 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order that denied Cenvat credit. The judgment affirmed the appellant's entitlement to avail the credit despite their job worker status, emphasizing that duty payment on the final product allowed for credit, even if duty was not paid on intermediate goods. The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit was supported, as the goods manufactured were not exempted, leading to the incorrect denial of credit under Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief as deemed appropriate. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:11:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353039 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order that denied Cenvat credit. The judgment affirmed the appellant's entitlement to avail the credit despite their job worker status, emphasizing that duty payment on the final product allowed for credit, even if duty was not paid on intermediate goods. The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit was supported, as the goods manufactured were not exempted, leading to the incorrect denial of credit under Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief as deemed appropriate. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353039