https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353036 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order that confirmed Central Excise duty demand, penalties on the company, and the personal penalty on the Managing Director. The decision was based on the discrepancy in the department's case regarding Central Excise duty payments and the separate discharge of Service Tax liability on fixtures assembled at customer sites. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:11:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353036 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order that confirmed Central Excise duty demand, penalties on the company, and the personal penalty on the Managing Director. The decision was based on the discrepancy in the department's case regarding Central Excise duty payments and the separate discharge of Service Tax liability on fixtures assembled at customer sites. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353036