https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353022 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the decision and ruling in their favor. The Tribunal found that the department failed to substantiate its allegations of clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise duty against the appellant, emphasizing the importance of proper investigation and corroborative evidence. The decision was based on the lack of conclusive proof linking the appellant to the alleged activities, especially considering similar duty demands against other parties were dropped due to insufficient evidence. en-us Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:10:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353022 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the decision and ruling in their favor. The Tribunal found that the department failed to substantiate its allegations of clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise duty against the appellant, emphasizing the importance of proper investigation and corroborative evidence. The decision was based on the lack of conclusive proof linking the appellant to the alleged activities, especially considering similar duty demands against other parties were dropped due to insufficient evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353022