<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1582 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against dropping the recovery of CENVAT credit on short inputs during physical stock-taking. The Tribunal found the shortage of inputs minimal compared to total consumption, with a reasonable explanation provided. Emphasizing the lack of evidence of wrongdoing and the importance of proper accounting practices, the Tribunal concluded the appeal lacked merit. The decision highlighted the need for legitimate use of inputs for availing CENVAT credit and proper explanation for shortages in manufacturing activities, aligning with relevant legal precedents and specific case circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1582 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against dropping the recovery of CENVAT credit on short inputs during physical stock-taking. The Tribunal found the shortage of inputs minimal compared to total consumption, with a reasonable explanation provided. Emphasizing the lack of evidence of wrongdoing and the importance of proper accounting practices, the Tribunal concluded the appeal lacked merit. The decision highlighted the need for legitimate use of inputs for availing CENVAT credit and proper explanation for shortages in manufacturing activities, aligning with relevant legal precedents and specific case circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>