<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 42 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11110</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed challenges against notices issued by the Income-tax Recovery Officer and an order made by the Assessing Officer under section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the importance of the Assessing Officer considering the case presented by the director of a private limited company under liquidation before making an adverse order. Directors are jointly and personally liable for tax payment, but if they can show non-recovery is not due to negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty, outcomes may differ. The court instructed the Assessing Officer to review the director&#039;s reply and make a decision promptly. The court quashed the Assessing Officer&#039;s previous order and expedited proceedings for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 42 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11110</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed challenges against notices issued by the Income-tax Recovery Officer and an order made by the Assessing Officer under section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the importance of the Assessing Officer considering the case presented by the director of a private limited company under liquidation before making an adverse order. Directors are jointly and personally liable for tax payment, but if they can show non-recovery is not due to negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty, outcomes may differ. The court instructed the Assessing Officer to review the director&#039;s reply and make a decision promptly. The court quashed the Assessing Officer&#039;s previous order and expedited proceedings for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>