<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 46 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11109</link>
    <description>The court upheld that the prize of Rs. 30,000 for caption writing was taxable income under section 2(24)(ix) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court rejected the argument that the receipt was casual and non-recurring, emphasizing it was a contractual payment, not a windfall. The court found the payment was based on skill and effort, making it taxable income. The court ruled in favor of the Department, denying tax exemption to the assessee and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 46 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11109</link>
      <description>The court upheld that the prize of Rs. 30,000 for caption writing was taxable income under section 2(24)(ix) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court rejected the argument that the receipt was casual and non-recurring, emphasizing it was a contractual payment, not a windfall. The court found the payment was based on skill and effort, making it taxable income. The court ruled in favor of the Department, denying tax exemption to the assessee and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>