<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 103 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197094</link>
    <description>The court determined that the term &quot;renovation&quot; under Section 13(1)(h) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act encompasses demolition and reconstruction. The landlord&#039;s genuine need for renovation was deemed bona fide and reasonable, leading to a decree for eviction in the landlord&#039;s favor. The court dismissed appeals and granted possession of the premises to the landlord, denying a certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 13:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 103 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197094</link>
      <description>The court determined that the term &quot;renovation&quot; under Section 13(1)(h) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act encompasses demolition and reconstruction. The landlord&#039;s genuine need for renovation was deemed bona fide and reasonable, leading to a decree for eviction in the landlord&#039;s favor. The court dismissed appeals and granted possession of the premises to the landlord, denying a certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>