https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197093 The SC partly allowed the appeals, affirming the protection of 66 candidates already appointed as Medical Technologists. It directed the State Government to consider the appellants' cases who had challenged the selection process, based on a merit list combining written and oral marks as per the HC's order. The SC dismissed applications from candidates who sought relief through interim applications, underscoring the necessity of timely judicial action. Despite a 559-day delay, the SC chose to hear the case, prioritizing larger interests over procedural delays. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2023 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197093 The SC partly allowed the appeals, affirming the protection of 66 candidates already appointed as Medical Technologists. It directed the State Government to consider the appellants' cases who had challenged the selection process, based on a merit list combining written and oral marks as per the HC's order. The SC dismissed applications from candidates who sought relief through interim applications, underscoring the necessity of timely judicial action. Despite a 559-day delay, the SC chose to hear the case, prioritizing larger interests over procedural delays. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197093