<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 457 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197092</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court modified the High Court&#039;s decision in a case concerning the refund of earnest money following a land cost increase. The Court held that the respondents had accepted the offer with the enhanced premium rate, justifying the forfeiture of earnest money. The appellant was directed to refund the excess amount to the respondents, excluding the earnest money. Failure to comply would result in the respondents being entitled to interest, with no costs awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 12:59:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 457 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197092</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court modified the High Court&#039;s decision in a case concerning the refund of earnest money following a land cost increase. The Court held that the respondents had accepted the offer with the enhanced premium rate, justifying the forfeiture of earnest money. The appellant was directed to refund the excess amount to the respondents, excluding the earnest money. Failure to comply would result in the respondents being entitled to interest, with no costs awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>