<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1277 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Service Tax demands on various transactions such as sales incentives, commissions, hire purchase charges, job work charges, and freight earned. The Tribunal ruled that these transactions did not fall under taxable Business Auxiliary Services, as contended by the appellant. The issue of limitation was left open for further consideration, granting the appellant consequential benefits according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1277 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Service Tax demands on various transactions such as sales incentives, commissions, hire purchase charges, job work charges, and freight earned. The Tribunal ruled that these transactions did not fall under taxable Business Auxiliary Services, as contended by the appellant. The issue of limitation was left open for further consideration, granting the appellant consequential benefits according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>