https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353007 The case involved the redrafting of a Final Order to rectify errors, the admissibility of CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods for manufacturing denatured spirit, the classification of rectified spirit under the Central Excise Tariff, and the interpretation of ethyl alcohol and rectified spirit as one commodity. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal, as it concluded that rectified spirit was synonymous with ethyl alcohol and should be classified accordingly. en-us Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353007 The case involved the redrafting of a Final Order to rectify errors, the admissibility of CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods for manufacturing denatured spirit, the classification of rectified spirit under the Central Excise Tariff, and the interpretation of ethyl alcohol and rectified spirit as one commodity. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal, as it concluded that rectified spirit was synonymous with ethyl alcohol and should be classified accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353007