<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1276 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353007</link>
    <description>Rectified spirit was treated as the same commodity as ethyl alcohol for tariff item 22072000, because it is only purified ethyl alcohol and not a distinct product. On that basis, its emergence in a continuous manufacturing process did not create a separate non-excisable intermediate so as to break the CENVAT credit chain. The notice denying credit on the footing that rectified spirit arose before denaturation was therefore unsustainable. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and rejected the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1276 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353007</link>
      <description>Rectified spirit was treated as the same commodity as ethyl alcohol for tariff item 22072000, because it is only purified ethyl alcohol and not a distinct product. On that basis, its emergence in a continuous manufacturing process did not create a separate non-excisable intermediate so as to break the CENVAT credit chain. The notice denying credit on the footing that rectified spirit arose before denaturation was therefore unsustainable. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and rejected the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>